create_doc_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the write operation and return value (created page with id), but lacks details on auth requirements, rate limits, or potential side effects. For a CRUD tool, this is adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two focused sentences with zero waste. The action verb 'Create' leads, followed by the resource and optional features. Every phrase adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description mentions the return (created page with id), which is sufficient. All 7 parameters are covered by the schema descriptions, and the tool's behavior is simple enough that the description provides complete context for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds meaning beyond the schema by stating 'optionally nested under an existing page' (referring to parent_page_id) and 'with initial content' (referring to content). It also clarifies the return value, which is not in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a new page inside a Doc, providing the product version (ClickUp Docs v3) and optional nesting/initial content. It distinguishes from siblings like create_doc (creates doc) and update_doc_page (updates page) by focusing on page creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions optional nesting under an existing page, which gives context for when to use the parent_page_id parameter. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide exclusions. The purpose is clear enough for an agent to infer usage from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.