create_doc

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool creates a Doc, optionally nests it, and returns the Doc with its id. However, it fails to mention the default behavior of the create_page parameter (which, according to the schema, defaults to true and creates an initial empty page). This omission is a moderate gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences: first covers purpose and options, second explains return value, third provides next-step guidance. Every sentence adds value, no wasted words, and it is front-loaded with the main action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters including a nested object, no output schema, the description is incomplete. It mentions return of 'id' but not other fields. Critically, it omits the create_page parameter's default behavior (creating an initial page), which is important for understanding the tool's output. This gap reduces completeness for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description summarizes the parameter roles (nesting, visibility) but does not add new semantic information beyond what the schema provides. It mentions 'optionally nested under a Space/Folder/List' and 'visibility setting', which align with schema fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new Doc in a Workspace (ClickUp Docs v3)', specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_doc_page by noting that pages can be added afterwards. This provides a clear purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context for when to use this tool (creating a Doc) and mentions the alternative create_doc_page for adding pages. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or compare with other create_* tools like create_folder, but the context is sufficient for an AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.