Update New Quiz Item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare idempotent and destructive hints. The description adds valuable context about rate limiting and suggested batching, which goes beyond structured metadata. Does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no redundancy. Front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by actionable usage notes. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with a complex item schema, the description focuses on operational aspects (serial calls, batching) that are not covered by schema or annotations. It could mention that different interaction types have different required fields, but that's already in the schema. No output schema exists, but the description doesn't need to explain returns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 83%, so parameters are largely documented. The description adds the crucial insight that all fields are optional and only changed fields need to be supplied, which is not explicit in the schema for partial updates.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it updates an existing item (question) in a New Quiz, using a specific verb and resource. Distinguishes from siblings like create_new_quiz_item, delete_new_quiz_item, and get_new_quiz_item by focusing on modification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit guidance on serial calls, chunking for >50 items, and handling rate limits. While it doesn't explicitly contrast with alternatives, the context and purpose make usage clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.