Delete File
delete_fileDelete a file from Canvas permanently by its ID.
Instructions
Delete a file by ID. This action is permanent.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_id | Yes | The Canvas file ID |
delete_fileDelete a file from Canvas permanently by its ID.
Delete a file by ID. This action is permanent.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_id | Yes | The Canvas file ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, so the description's 'permanent' adds minimal new information. It does not disclose any additional behavioral traits beyond what annotations cover, such as side effects or authorizations required.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences with no filler. The purpose and key warning are front-loaded and concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple deletion tool with one parameter and destructive annotation, the description is adequate. It omits potential side effects (e.g., cascading deletion of associated objects) but is acceptable given the simplicity and annotation coverage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the sole parameter file_id described as 'The Canvas file ID'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's parameter documentation, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Delete a file by ID', using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like upload_file, download_file, and get_file by focusing on the deletion action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage (when you want to permanently delete a file) but does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it. It could benefit from noting that the action is irreversible, but that is also implied by annotations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bruchris/canvas-lms-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server