Skip to main content
Glama
bruchris

Canvas LMS MCP Server

by bruchris
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

List Submission Comments Needing Attention

list_submission_comments_needing_attention
Read-only

List submissions where the most recent comment is from the student and has not been addressed by grading or a reply — i.e. comments the instructor has likely not seen. Returns a triage list, oldest-unaddressed first.

Instructions

List submissions where the most recent comment is from the student and has not been addressed by grading or a reply — i.e. comments the instructor has likely not seen. Returns a triage list, oldest-unaddressed first. Requires instructor/TA permissions in the course.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
course_idYesThe Canvas course ID
unread_onlyNoWhen true, only return submissions where read_status is "unread". Default false.
assignment_idsNoScope the scan to specific assignment IDs (fetches all assignments when omitted)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.18.15
    • addedInput schema / properties / assignment_ids / items / anyOf
      Added value: +[
+  {
+    "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
+    "maximum": 9007199254740991,
+    "type": "integer"
+  },
+  {
+    "pattern": "^[1-9][0-9]{0,18}$",
+    "type": "string"
+  }
+]
    • removedInput schema / properties / assignment_ids / items / type
      Removed value: -"number"
    • addedInput schema / properties / course_id / anyOf
      Added value: +[
+  {
+    "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
+    "maximum": 9007199254740991,
+    "type": "integer"
+  },
+  {
+    "pattern": "^[1-9][0-9]{0,18}$",
+    "type": "string"
+  }
+]
    • removedInput schema / properties / course_id / type
      Removed value: -"number"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.18.11
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  3. Addedv1.18.2

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so safety is covered. The description adds two genuinely behavioral facts beyond that: the result ordering (oldest-unaddressed first) and the required instructor/TA permission level. It omits pagination and rate-limit behavior for what could be a large scan.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with no filler: the filter definition comes first, then the return shape, then the permission requirement. Every clause carries information an agent needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only triage list with no output schema, the description covers the filtering semantics, ordering, and authorization level, which is nearly everything needed to call it correctly. Minor gaps remain around result size/pagination and how it relates to the awaiting-grading sibling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all three parameters (course_id, unread_only, assignment_ids) are already documented in the schema. The description adds the overall filtering concept but does not clarify the interaction between 'addressed' status and unread_only, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb (List) plus resource (submissions where the most recent comment is from the student and unaddressed), and resolves the fuzzy phrase 'needing attention' with an explicit 'i.e.' clause. This sharply separates it from siblings like list_submissions_awaiting_grading, since the trigger here is a student comment rather than an ungraded submission.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It sets clear usage context: a triage list for comments the instructor has likely not seen, plus a permission prerequisite. It does not, however, name a competing sibling (e.g. list_submissions_awaiting_grading) or state when NOT to use this tool, so the routing guidance is implicit rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools