Update Appointment Group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations include destructiveHint=true and openWorldHint=true, indicating a mutating operation. The description adds context beyond annotations by explaining the purpose of key parameters like publish (making a draft visible) and new_appointments (adding time slots). It does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose ('Update an existing appointment group'), followed by concise, actionable guidance on key parameters. No redundant or filler content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high schema coverage and annotations, the description is adequately complete. It covers the essential mutation behavior and highlights the most important optional parameters. It does not mention return values or output, but no output schema exists and that is not a requirement.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% description coverage for all 8 parameters. The tool description adds semantic value by clarifying the effect of publish (making a draft visible) and new_appointments (adding time slots), which goes beyond the schema's basic field descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Update an existing appointment group.' This uses a specific verb and resource, and it distinguishes itself from sibling tools like create_appointment_group, get_appointment_group, and delete_appointment_group by making the update operation explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context on how to use the tool, such as 'Use publish=true to make a draft group visible to participants, or add new time slots via new_appointments.' It gives concrete usage examples but does not explicitly contrast with alternative tools (e.g., 'use create_appointment_group for new groups'), though that is implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.