delete_new_quiz

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds 'This action is permanent' which reinforces the destructiveHint annotation. However, the annotations already declare destructiveHint and idempotentHint, so the description adds marginal value beyond that. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two concise sentences that front-load the purpose and then deliver key warnings. Every word is necessary; no wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple deletion tool with two required parameters and no output schema, the description covers the essential aspects: action, resource, permanence, and parameter hint. It lacks information about return values or permissions, but given the low complexity, it is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds critical clarification: 'Use assignment_id (not quiz_id)', which resolves potential confusion since the tool name includes 'quiz'. This adds meaningful value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Delete) and resource (New Quiz LTI) in a Canvas course. It also distinguishes from siblings like delete_assignment by specifying 'New Quiz' and warning about using assignment_id instead of quiz_id, providing high clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells users to use assignment_id (not quiz_id), which is a crucial usage guideline. It implies this tool is for New Quizzes specifically, but does not explicitly list when not to use it or mention alternative tools for other delete operations. Still, the guidance is clear and helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.