Delete New Quiz Item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states 'This action is permanent,' which is crucial behavioral information beyond the annotations (destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true). It adds context that deletions are irreversible. It does not mention auth requirements or side effects on quiz structure, but the permanence is a strong plus.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, both essential: the first defines purpose and scope, the second adds critical behavioral context. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the destructive nature and the annotations, the description is quite complete. It notes permanence, which many destructive operations lack. It could mention prerequisites (like existence of the quiz) but the schema already requires all IDs, and the output is likely void. Overall adequate for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, documenting all three parameters. The description does not add parameter-level details, but the schema is sufficient. The description's 'permanent' note complements the parameter semantics by emphasizing the irreversible nature, which is valuable context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete an item (question)') and the resource ('a New Quiz (LTI)'), distinguishing it from siblings like delete_new_quiz (which deletes the quiz itself) and get_new_quiz_item. It is specific and concise.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_new_quiz_item vs delete_new_quiz). The context implies it's for deleting individual questions within a New Quiz, but no explicit guidance on when not to use it or alternative tools is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.