create_buff_skill

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It states the tool adds a buff effect for a number of turns, which is the core behavior. However, it does not disclose potential side effects, permissions, or whether the created skill is immediately usable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise and front-loaded with the purpose. It is not verbose, but could benefit from a bit more structure or detail without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a creation action with no output schema, the description should explain outcomes like whether the skill is saved, if an ID is returned, or if it automatically integrates. The current description is insufficient for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and describes each parameter well. The description adds only generic context ('adds a buff effect to a parameter for a number of turns') without providing additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a buff skill with a specific verb 'create' and resource 'buff skill'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'create_skill' and 'create_damage_skill' by noting it is simplified and focused on buff effects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'create_skill' or 'create_healing_skill'. It mentions 'simplified' but does not elaborate on context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.