update_store_url

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only labels the tool as a mutation but does not disclose side effects (e.g., whether old URL becomes invalid, if there's a propagation delay, or if specific permissions are required). This leaves the agent uninformed about consequences of invoking the tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is extremely concise, one sentence plus a mutation tag. Every word is necessary, no fluff. It front-loads the purpose and keeps the message direct.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is adequate for basic understanding but lacks behavioral and usage context. A minimal viable description, but missing details for the agent to fully assess impact and conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear parameter description for 'url_tienda'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond stating it updates the store URL, which is already implied. Baseline score of 3 applies as the schema does the work, and the description does not enhance understanding of the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool updates the store URL with specific verb 'Actualiza' (updates) and resource 'URL de la tienda'. The mutation tag further clarifies it's a write operation. This distinguishes it from other update tools like update_agent or update_business_info, as it uniquely targets the store URL.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., for other store-related updates like update_order_settings or update_business_info). There is no mention of prerequisites, exclusions, or scenarios where this tool should not be used.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.