configure_webhooks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description fully handles transparency. It labels the tool as mutation, describes the confirmation flow (buttons, confirm parameter), and warns against multiple calls. However, it doesn't detail side effects or revertibility, but overall is quite transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is slightly long but well-structured with bold and caps for critical instructions. Each sentence serves a purpose: stating the action, giving prerequisites, warnings, and confirmation requirement. No fluff, though it could be marginally shorter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 5 parameters and no output schema, the description covers usage context, mutation nature, confirmation mechanism, and links to get_webhook_config. It omits return value description, but the schema details parameters adequately. Overall, it provides sufficient context for an agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage, so baseline is 3. The description mentions 'URL, eventos, etc.' but does not add significant meaning beyond what the schema already provides for each parameter. It does reference the confirm parameter indirectly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool modifies webhook configuration ('Modifica la configuracion de webhooks'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_webhook_config by specifying that you must call that first. The purpose is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit usage guidelines are provided: always call get_webhook_config before, confirm with user, only call with concrete data, and never call again after (as system will ask for button confirmation). The need for confirm=true is also noted. This helps the agent avoid misuse.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.