delete_ai_error

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior. The '[mutation]' tag hints at a write operation, but there is no mention of consequences (e.g., irreversible deletion, required permissions) beyond the basic delete action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with key action and resource. It is concise but could be slightly improved by including one more sentence on usage context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simple nature (single required parameter, no output schema), the description should at least mention that this action is permanent or requires specific permissions. It lacks such completeness, making it less helpful for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes the single parameter 'id' as 'ID of the correction to delete'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate given 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete AI Correction' with verb 'Delete' and resource 'AI Correction', making the purpose unambiguous. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling 'delete_customer_ai_error' which also deletes a similar resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'update_ai_error' or 'delete_customer_ai_error'. The description does not mention prerequisites or context for deletion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.