get_plugin_conversations

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It mentions filtering by time period but does not disclose pagination, limits, ordering, or whether it's read-only. The summary is too brief for behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short at two sentences, which is efficient. However, it omits necessary details for completeness, making it slightly under-specified rather than optimally concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters, no output schema, and many siblings, the description is too brief. It does not explain return structure, pagination behavior, or how it differs from similar list tools. The trailing '[query]' is ambiguous.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 5 parameters with descriptions, achieving 100% coverage. The description adds minimal value by summarizing 'supports time period filters', but does not elaborate on syntax or edge cases, meeting baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it shows plugin conversations from web chat with time period filters, but does not differentiate from siblings like get_plugin_chat_sessions or get_chat_sessions. The verb 'Ver' and resource 'conversaciones del plugin' are specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives. The description only states what it does, with no when/when-not or sibling differentiation. Siblings like get_plugin_chat_sessions and get_conversation_detail also list conversations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.