get_agent_assignments

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Devuelve' (returns), implying a read-only operation, but does not specify if the tool has side effects, requires authorization, or has rate limits. Critical behavioral context is missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two clear clauses, no wasted words, and front-loaded purpose. It achieves maximum information density.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic purpose and input but lacks information about the output structure, what happens if phones are invalid, or if multiple agents can be assigned per phone. Without an output schema, more context would be helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes the parameter 'phones' as 'Lista de numeros de telefono para consultar sus agentes asignados' with 100% coverage. The description adds 'de clientes' (customers), which is redundant with the schema description. No additional meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('obtener asignaciones de agentes') and the input ('lista de telefonos de clientes'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_agents (which lists all agents) or get_agent_activity (which focuses on agent performance). However, it could be more explicit about the output.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_agents or get_agent_activity. There is no mention of prerequisites, limitations, or context for appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.