dismiss_training_suggestion

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It includes a '[mutation]' tag indicating state change, but does not disclose if the action is irreversible, what triggers it, or any side effects. More details are needed for confident invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, concise and well-structured. It front-loads the Spanish action and provides an English clarification. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple mutation tool with no output schema or annotations, the description is minimally adequate. It lacks details on consequences (e.g., whether the suggestion is permanently removed) but covers the basic operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description cannot add much. It restates 'reason' as optional, which matches the schema. No additional semantics beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Descartar sugerencia de entrenamiento' (dismiss a training suggestion) with an optional reason. It effectively distinguishes from siblings like 'apply_training_suggestion' and 'get_training_suggestions' by specifying the dismiss action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like applying or keeping the suggestion. There is no mention of context or prerequisites for dismissing a suggestion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.