Skip to main content
Glama

update_knowledge_snippet

Approve, reject, edit, or delete knowledge snippets for learned data. Confirmation param required to execute actions.

Instructions

Gestionar snippet de conocimiento — Permite aprobar, rechazar, editar o eliminar un dato aprendido. Usa filter=pending en list_knowledge_snippets para ver los pendientes de revision. IMPORTANTE: Esta accion requiere confirmacion - ver seccion confirmation_flow. [mutation] (requiere confirmación: pasar confirm=true para ejecutar)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesID del snippet a gestionar
actionYesAccion a realizar: approve, reject, edit, delete, resolve_conflict, keep_both, toggle_permanent, reject_and_propose
contentNoNuevo contenido (solo para action=edit)
categoryNoNueva categoria (solo para action=edit)
keep_idNoID del snippet a mantener (solo para action=resolve_conflict)
confirmNoPasar true para confirmar la ejecución de esta acción peligrosa
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that it is a mutation requiring confirmation, but lacks details on side effects, reversibility, or error handling. With no annotations, the description partially covers behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences plus an important note about confirmation. Front-loaded and efficient, though could be better structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks context about outcomes of different actions, especially destructive ones like delete. No output schema, so description should compensate but does not.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the description adds minimal meaning beyond the schema. It mentions using filter=pending on another tool but does not elaborate on the parameters here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool manages knowledge snippets with actions like approve, reject, edit, delete. It uses a specific verb and resource but fails to differentiate from sibling tools that target individual actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a usage hint for finding pending snippets and notes confirmation needed, but does not explain when to use this combined tool versus the specific sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wazionapps/mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server