toggle_analytics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only adds '[mutation]' to indicate a write operation. It does not disclose potential side effects, whether the toggle is reversible, or if any state changes are immediate or require propagation. The description carries the full burden but provides minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with a brief title. It is front-loaded and efficient, though it could benefit from slightly more structure (e.g., breaking into separate lines for clarity).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple boolean toggle, the description is minimally complete. It explains the action and parameter but lacks details on behavior when already in the desired state, any prerequisites, or confirmation of effect. Given the simplicity, it is adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with a clear description for the only parameter. The description adds 'con structured outputs' which reinforces the parameter's meaning but does not provide additional semantic depth beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool toggles analytics with structured outputs, using specific verbs (activar/desactivar) and identifies the resource (analytics registration for this store). It distinguishes itself from read-only analytics tools like get_analytics or get_structured_analytics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for enabling or disabling structured output analytics but lacks explicit guidance on when to use versus siblings, such as when to choose this over get_structured_analytics or other configuration tools. No when-not-to-use or alternative mentions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.