create_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It includes a [mutation] tag indicating data modification, but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or return value. Minimal behavioral context beyond the mutation flag.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with a mutation tag. It is efficient but could be more structured with key information front-loaded. However, it is not verbose and earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 11 parameters (many optional) and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It does not explain what happens upon creation, prerequisites, or what the return value is. More context is needed for an agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is high (91%), so the schema already documents parameters. The description adds only that the task is optionally associated with a client and agent, which is reflected in parameters like 'phone' and 'assigned_agent_id'. No additional semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new task, optionally associated with a client and agent, using the verb 'crear' (create) and specific resource 'tarea'. Among siblings like 'update_task', it distinctly identifies creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for creating tasks but provides no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternatives like 'update_task' for modifications. Usage context is only inferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.