get_plugin_conversation_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description should fully disclose behavior. It only states it shows complete messages, lacking details about whether it requires authentication, if it's read-only, or if there are limits. Does not contradict annotations (none exist), but fails to compensate for missing annotation context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise, one-sentence description that front-loads the tool's purpose. No wasted words. Could possibly benefit from structured formatting, but efficiency is achieved.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter retrieval tool without an output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It does not specify return format or completeness guarantees, but given the tool's straightforward nature, it covers the basics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (one parameter with description). The parameter 'session_id' is clearly described as the chat session ID. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves complete messages of a plugin conversation, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_plugin_conversations (likely lists) or get_conversation_detail (non-plugin). The verb 'Muestra' (shows) and specific resource 'detalle de conversacion de plugin' make the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus related tools like get_plugin_conversations or get_conversation_detail. The context is implied but not stated. With many sibling tools, the agent may need more direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.