configure_plugin_productqa

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description includes a '[mutation]' tag indicating side effects, but with no annotations, it fails to disclose behavioral details like immediate impact on existing widgets, reversibility, or required permissions. The effects of the 'is_enabled' toggle are not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the purpose. The '[mutation]' tag is helpful. However, it could be slightly more structured by separating the activation and configuration aspects.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description lacks any mention of return values or confirmation. It does not explain if changes take effect immediately, require page refresh, or if the plugin must be installed first. This leaves gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description does not add additional context beyond the schema. The baseline of 3 applies as the description adds no extra meaning, such as examples or constraints, to the parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool configures the Product Q&A plugin, activating and configuring the product questions widget. The verb 'configurar' and resource 'plugin Product Q&A' are specific, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like 'configure_plugin_chat' or 'get_product_qa_stats'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as other plugin configuration tools or product Q&A management tools. There is no mention of prerequisites or scenarios where this tool should or should not be used.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.