delete_docqa_file

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It discloses that the action is a mutation and requires confirmation, but fails to mention whether deletion is permanent, what happens to associated data, or any authentication needs. The description is insufficient for full behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that includes the key information: purpose, mutation indicator, and confirmation requirement. It is front-loaded and concise, though it could be more structured with explicit sections. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 parameters, no output schema), the description covers the main points. However, it lacks details about reversibility, dependencies (e.g., if the file is in use), or any prerequisites. It is adequate but not fully complete for a deletion operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, but the description adds context by labeling the confirm parameter as necessary for a 'peligrosa' (dangerous) action and instructing to pass 'confirm=true' to execute. This provides behavioral semantics beyond the schema's mere parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Eliminar' (delete), the resource 'archivo de Doc-QA', and specifies it's a mutation. It distinguishes from siblings like 'upload_docqa_file' and 'list_docqa_files' by clearly defining the action and context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains that confirmation (confirm=true) is required to execute, but does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_knowledge_file) or when not to use it. The usage context is implied but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.