get_docqa_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the tool retrieves details and statistics, but does not mention permissions, side effects, error handling (e.g., invalid assistant_id), or data freshness. Read operation is implied but not stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but includes a redundant prefix 'Detalle de asistente Doc-QA' and a stray '[query]'. It could be more front-loaded and avoid the placeholder. Acceptable but not excellent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema or annotations, the description should explain what 'detalles completos' entails. It lacks information about response structure, required permissions, error cases, and whether it is a read-only operation. Incomplete for a simple get tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter assistant_id described as 'ID del asistente Doc-QA'. The description adds 'detalles completos' and 'estadisticas' but does not enrich the parameter meaning beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Obtiene' and resource 'asistente Doc-QA', indicating it retrieves full details including statistics. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_docqa_stats and list_docqa_assistants. However, the stray '[query]' at the end creates minor confusion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_docqa_stats or list_docqa_assistants. The description implies usage for a single assistant's full details, but no when-not or alternative advice is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.