users-list
users-listList all users in the system, accessible only to administrators.
Instructions
Lists all users in the system (admin only)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
users-listList all users in the system, accessible only to administrators.
Lists all users in the system (admin only)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description only mentions admin permission, omitting behavioral traits like pagination, rate limits, or result format. With no annotations, the description should disclose more.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, clear sentence. No superfluous words. Front-loaded with purpose and constraint.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal but covers purpose and constraint. Lacks return value description (e.g., list of user objects). Since no output schema, description could provide more context. Adequate for a simple list tool but not comprehensive.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters in schema; schema coverage 100%. Description adds no parameter info, but none is needed. Baseline for zero parameters is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states action (Lists all users), resource (users), scope (in the system), and constraint (admin only). Distinguishes from sibling tools like users-get or users-get_current.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly mentions admin-only restriction, guiding usage context. Lacks explicit mention of when not to use or alternative tools, but the constraint is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mstang/casemgr-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server