Skip to main content
Glama

invoices-list_unbilled_durations

invoices-list_unbilled_durations

List unbilled durations not yet linked to any invoice. Optionally filter by case ID for targeted review.

Instructions

Lists all durations not yet linked to any invoice

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
case_idNoFilter by case ID (@rid format)
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It correctly implies a read-only operation ('lists') but provides no details on side effects, permissions, or return format. Adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no waste, front-loaded with key action. Slightly sparse but effective for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema provided, and description fails to mention return format, pagination, or error handling. For a list tool, this is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema already documents the only parameter (case_id) with clear description. Description adds no extra meaning, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool lists durations not linked to any invoice, using specific verb 'lists' and resource, distinguishing it from siblings like invoices-list and invoices-get_durations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like invoices-get_durations or invoices-list_unbilled_expenses. Lacks any context or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mstang/casemgr-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server