items-list_children
items-list_childrenList all child items of a parent case file item using its @rid ID.
Instructions
Lists all children of a case file item
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| parent_id | Yes | Parent item ID (@rid format) |
items-list_childrenList all child items of a parent case file item using its @rid ID.
Lists all children of a case file item
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| parent_id | Yes | Parent item ID (@rid format) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description lacks disclosure of behavioral traits such as whether children are direct only, error handling for invalid parent_id, or read-only nature.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence conveys core purpose without redundancy, but could benefit from a bit more context on return structure.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks details on return format, edge cases, or relationship to other item-listing tools; minimal for a hierarchical list operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description of parent_id format; description adds no extra meaning beyond what schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action ('Lists') and resource ('children of a case file item'), distinguishing it from siblings like 'items-list' and 'items-list_orphaned'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'cases-list_subcases' or 'items-list'; usage context is implied by the name but not explicitly stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mstang/casemgr-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server