users-get
users-getRetrieve user details by providing the user ID in @rid format, available only to administrators.
Instructions
Gets a user by ID (admin only)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | User ID (@rid format) |
users-getRetrieve user details by providing the user ID in @rid format, available only to administrators.
Gets a user by ID (admin only)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | User ID (@rid format) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries the burden. Only discloses admin restriction, but does not mention that it's a read-only operation, return format, or error scenarios. Minimal behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words. Efficiently conveys purpose and a key condition.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is adequate but lacks details like return type or error handling. Not incomplete but could be more informative.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (single parameter documented). Description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides for the parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Gets a user by ID' which is a specific verb-resource combination, and adds '(admin only)' which distinguishes it from sibling tools like users-list or users-get_current.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly mentions admin requirement, but does not provide guidance on when not to use or mention alternatives among siblings. Only gives a usage condition, not full context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mstang/casemgr-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server