clients-delete
clients-deleteDelete a client record by providing their unique identifier.
Instructions
Deletes a client
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| client_id | Yes | Client ID (@rid format) |
clients-deleteDelete a client record by providing their unique identifier.
Deletes a client
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| client_id | Yes | Client ID (@rid format) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only says 'Deletes a client', lacking details on permanence, side effects, or required permissions. This is insufficient for a destructive operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (3 words) with no wasted language. It is front-loaded and to the point, though it may sacrifice completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (1 required param, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate. However, it omits important context such as error conditions or post-deletion effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% with a clear description of client_id. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (deletes) and the resource (client). It is specific and not a tautology. However, it does not differentiate from other delete tools among siblings, such as cases-delete or invoices-delete.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus other delete tools or any prerequisites. The description simply states the action without context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mstang/casemgr-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server