delimit_digest

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'generate' without mentioning side effects, whether it modifies state, permission requirements, or any limitations. The agent cannot infer important behavioral aspects like whether it sends notifications or writes to files.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise. However, it includes an unnecessary ticket reference (LED-966) that does not help an AI agent. Removing it would make the description cleaner, but it is still efficient overall.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 optional parameters, a non-trivial output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is too brief to be fully complete. It lacks explanation of the output format, usage context, or any constraints. However, it covers the basic purpose adequately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides descriptions for all 4 parameters (100% coverage), so the description does not need to add meaning. The description offers no additional clarification beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates a daily digest of loop activity, specifying the verb ('generate'), resource ('daily digest of loop activity'), and scope. However, it includes a ticket reference (LED-966) that is not meaningful for an AI agent and does not help differentiate from sibling tools like 'delimit_agent_dashboard' or 'delimit_loop_status'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as other 'delimit' tools for configuration or status. It lacks any contextual clues about prerequisites or scenarios where this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.