Skip to main content
Glama

delimit_agent_policy

Set or view per-model permissions to control what each AI model can access: ledger, memory, evidence, secrets, and deployment. Supports read-only, read-write, or none.

Instructions

Set or view per-model governance permissions (Pro).

Controls what each AI model can do. Without arguments, shows all policies. With a model name, shows or updates that model's policy.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
modelNoAI model name (claude, codex, gemini, cursor). Empty = show all.
ledgerNoLedger access level (read-only, read-write, none).
memoryNoMemory access level (read-only, read-write, none).
deployNoAllow deploys (true/false).
evidenceNoEvidence access level (read-only, read-write, none).
secretsNoAllow secret access (true/false).
custom_constraintsNoComma-separated constraints (e.g. "no-deploy,no-publish").

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses read/write nature but lacks details on side effects, auth requirements, or impact of updates. Adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two well-structured sentences, front-loaded with purpose. Every sentence earns its place with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers core behavior for a 7-parameter tool with output schema. Missing prerequisites or consequences of updates, but sufficient for most use cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds little beyond summarizing parameter categories (ledger, memory, etc.) that are already documented in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Set or view per-model governance permissions (Pro)' and distinguishes behavior with vs. without arguments, making it distinct from sibling tools like delimit_gov_policy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly explains when to use without arguments (show all) and with a model name (show/update). However, no exclusions or alternatives are mentioned despite many siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/delimit-ai/delimit-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server