delimit_deploy_site

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions multi-step actions (git commit, push, Vercel build, deploy) but doesn't disclose side effects, permissions, or reversibility. With no annotations, this is insufficient for an agent to understand behavioral traits beyond the basic sequence.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence) but sacrifices necessary detail. It is front-loaded with the main action, but overall lacks structure to convey key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a multi-step deployment tool and the presence of many related siblings, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain output, prerequisites, or potential risks, making it inadequate for safe selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the tool description does not explain the two parameters (project_path, message). An agent cannot infer their meanings or required inputs from the description alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Deploy a site') and lists the steps (git commit, push, Vercel build, deploy). However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from siblings like delimit_deploy_build or delimit_deploy_publish, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delimit_deploy_build, delimit_deploy_plan). It only states what it does, not context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.