delimit_content_schedule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a read-only view operation. However, with no annotations provided, it does not disclose authentication needs, rate limits, or other behavioral traits. The 'Pro' label adds a minor contextual note.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that uses a colon to list items. It is front-loaded and concise with no extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters and the presence of an output schema, the description is sufficiently complete. It clearly outlines what will be displayed (queued tweets, pending videos, recent activity), and no additional context seems necessary for this simple view tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and the input schema is fully covered. The description explains what the tool shows, adding value beyond the empty schema. Baseline 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'View the upcoming content schedule' with specific items (queued tweets, pending videos, recent activity). It distinguishes from related siblings like delimit_content_publish and delimit_content_queue by focusing on viewing rather than publishing or queueing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for viewing the content schedule but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives. No guidance on when not to use it or mention of related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.