Skip to main content
Glama

delimit_handoff_create

Create a handoff receipt to document completed and pending tasks, blockers, and next actions when transitioning between agents.

Instructions

Create a handoff receipt when transitioning between agents/sessions (Pro).

Documents what was done, what wasn't, and what the next agent should do. The receiving agent should acknowledge before starting work.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
task_descriptionNoWhat the task was (one line).
completedNoComma-separated list of completed items.
not_completedNoComma-separated list of items not completed (with reasons).
assumptionsNoComma-separated assumptions made during work.
blockersNoComma-separated blockers encountered.
files_modifiedNoJSON list of {path, change_type, summary} dicts, or empty for auto-detect.
in_scopeNoComma-separated items that were in scope.
out_of_scopeNoComma-separated items explicitly excluded.
next_actionNoWhat the receiving agent should do first.
priorityNoP0/P1/P2.P1
to_modelNoTarget model (or "any").any

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations to contradict; description outlines documentation purpose (completed, not completed, next action) but omits side effects, permissions, or destructive nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with purpose and usage; efficient but could be slightly more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately covers purpose, usage, and documentation fields given optional parameters and existing output schema; no major gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

100% schema coverage so baseline is 3; description adds minor context about documenting items but largely repeats schema info.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it creates a handoff receipt for agent/session transitions, distinguishing it from sibling tools like acknowledge and list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use (transitioning agents/sessions) and implies acknowledgment before starting work, but lacks explicit alternatives or when-not-to-use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/delimit-ai/delimit-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server