delimit_build_loop_daemon

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It discloses behavioral traits: spawns daemon thread, calls iteration functions at a set interval, logs to a JSONL file, and respects loop config safeguards. However, it omits details on error handling, resource impact, or concurrency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three short paragraphs, front-loading the purpose, then detailing behavior and safeguards. Every sentence is meaningful, with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core functionality, logging, and safeguards. However, it does not mention prerequisites (e.g., delimit_loop_config must exist) or the nature of the called iteration functions. Since an output schema exists, return values are covered externally. Minor gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, but the description adds value by clarifying that interval_seconds and loop_type are only used on start, that session_id is required for all actions, and that default values map to specific meanings (e.g., 900 = 15 min). This goes beyond simply repeating schema fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is a 'Background auto-pull daemon' for governed build/social/deploy loops, specifies it spawns a daemon thread, calls iteration functions, and logs task IDs. This verb+resource combination distinguishes it from sibling tools like delimit_build_loop and delimit_daemon_run.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for automated background looping but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like delimit_daemon_run or delimit_build_loop. There is no mention of when not to use it or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.