delimit_content_publish

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It notes the action (trigger publish) but omits crucial details such as side effects, required permissions, or whether the operation is reversible, making it insufficiently transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that quickly conveys the core purpose. It is front-loaded and efficient, though it could benefit from a brief example or bullet list to improve scanability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple input schema and the presence of an output schema, the description covers the basic functionality but lacks details on prerequisites (e.g., queued content), expected output, and error scenarios, leaving some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and describes each parameter value well. The description adds minimal extra context (e.g., 'Pro' for YouTube), but does not go beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool triggers a content publish, specifying two concrete resource types (tweet and YouTube video), which distinguishes it from sibling content management tools like delimit_content_queue or delimit_content_schedule.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explains when to use the tool (manual trigger for queued tweet or next video), but does not explicitly mention when not to use it or suggest alternatives like automatic scheduling, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.