set_content_control_value

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds value by explaining the checkbox value format, but it does not disclose side effects, error conditions, or return value behavior. With no annotations, the description should provide more context about potential failures or required document state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of two sentences and a minimal bullet list. It wastes no words and places the core purpose upfront.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and the presence of an output schema, the description covers the essential purpose and parameter details. However, it lacks explanation of what happens if the tag is invalid or if the content control is locked, which would be helpful for correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Since schema coverage is 0%, the description fully explains both parameters: 'tag' as the identifier and 'value' with specific checkbox formatting. This adds significant meaning beyond the schema's type-only definitions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update'), the resource ('value/text of a content control'), and the identification method ('by its tag'). This effectively distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'add_content_control' or 'get_content_control'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'update_content_control' (which may modify other properties). There is no mention of prerequisites or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.