get_style

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but the description is straightforward for a read operation. It does not discuss side effects, permissions, or error cases, but for a simple lookup this is minimally adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is a single paragraph with clearly labeled Args and Returns. No redundant information; every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description includes a return structure, which compensates for the lack of an output schema. It covers the essential information needed to use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage 0%, so description must add value. It explains that name_or_id accepts both style name and styleId and is case-insensitive, which goes beyond the schema's type.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves a single style by name or ID (case-insensitive). It distinguishes from sibling get_styles by emphasizing 'single' vs the plural form, which implies listing multiple.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when you need details of one style. It does not explicitly state when not to use (e.g., for listing all styles, use get_styles), but the context of siblings makes it fairly clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.