ncloud_sourcedeploy_get_objectstorage_objects

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds no new behavioral insights. It correctly indicates a read operation but does not disclose any additional traits like potential pagination, rate limits, or data freshness.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no superfluous text. It is front-loaded and efficient, earning its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, and the description omits what the list response contains (e.g., object keys, metadata). Given the simplicity (1 param), it is mostly adequate but leaves the agent guessing about return format. Within the large sibling set, it is not positioned relative to SourceDeploy workflows.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter bucketName is fully described in the schema ('Name of the Object Storage bucket'), and the description adds no extra semantics beyond that. With 100% schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (get list) and resource (objects in Object Storage bucket). It's specific, though it doesn't distinguish from the sibling tool ncloud_list_objects, which serves a similar purpose for general Object Storage. The name includes 'sourcedeploy', hinting at scope, but the description doesn't capitalize on that.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ncloud_list_objects. The description does not provide context for choosing this over sibling tools, nor does it mention any prerequisites or restrictions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.