ncloud_livestation_delete_channel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. Description adds context about the confirm safety gate and the need to end streaming, which goes beyond annotations. No contradiction found.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences that immediately convey destructive nature, precondition, and required parameter. No extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation, the description covers purpose, prerequisite, and key parameter. Lacks details about post-deletion state or error handling, but these are common knowledge for destructive operations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions. The description adds value by explicitly linking confirm to execution ('Set confirm=true to execute'), clarifying a critical behavioral nuance not fully captured in the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (terminate) and resource (Live Station channel), and emphasizes permanence ('Permanently terminate'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like stop or resume.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a clear prerequisite ('End broadcast streaming before terminating') and specifies the required parameter confirm=true to execute. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternative tools (e.g., stop for temporary halt).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.