ncloud_remove_process_plugin

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark it as destructive and idempotent. The description adds the critical behavioral detail that a confirm flag must be set to true for execution, which goes beyond the annotations. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with a front-loaded warning emoji and Destructive label. Every part is meaningful and there is no unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the essential information: what the tool does (remove plugins), the target (server instance), and the mandatory confirm flag. Given the tool's straightforward nature and the absence of an output schema, the description is adequately complete. A minor improvement could be mentioning that no output is expected on success.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for each parameter. The description reinforces the confirm parameter requirement but adds no new semantic meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (remove), the resource (process monitoring plugin(s) from a server instance), and distinguishes it from sibling tools like ncloud_add_process_plugin or ncloud_set_process_plugins. The warning emoji and 'Destructive' label further clarify its nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions setting confirm=true to execute, which implies the default is a no-op, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like ncloud_list_process_plugins or ncloud_set_process_plugins. No explicit when-not-to-use or alternative tools are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.