ncloud_cdss_upgrade_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry full behavioral transparency. It only says 'upgrade,' which implies mutation, but no details on destructiveness, downtime, reversibility, or response behavior. The agent cannot assess risks.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, clear and to the point. However, it could benefit from additional context without becoming verbose. Still efficient for the information it delivers.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (upgrade operation, 3 params, no output schema, no annotations), the description is very incomplete. It lacks information on side effects, permissions, and typical workflow (e.g., precheck).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (upgrade), resource (Kafka version), and target (CDSS cluster). It is specific enough to distinguish from many sibling tools, though it doesn't differentiate from related CDSS upgrade tools like precheck or status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ncloud_cdss_upgrade_precheck or ncloud_cdss_upgrade_status. Lacks prerequisites, recommendations, or context about typical workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.