ncloud_functions_create_package

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description minimally states the operation but does not disclose behavioral traits beyond the annotations (destructiveHint=false). No details on authorization requirements, side effects, or response behavior are provided. The description adds little value over the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks necessary detail. It is not overly verbose, but its brevity sacrifices informativeness, earning a middling score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters and handles both creation and update behaviors, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the create vs update logic, required fields beyond packageName, or how parameters interact. The lack of output schema and limited description leaves the agent underinformed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers all 4 parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The description does not add meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies 'Create or update a Cloud Functions package', clearly identifying the verb (create/update) and resource (Cloud Functions package). However, it does not clarify the distinction between creating and updating (e.g., whether it's idempotent or how it handles existing packages), lacking sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ncloud_functions_delete_package or ncloud_functions_create_action. There are no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or prerequisite statements.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.