ncloud_nks_update_secret_encryption

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description's 'Configure' is consistent but adds no extra behavioral context (e.g., whether it replaces or modifies existing encryption). It adequately complements annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with no redundancy or unnecessary words. It is perfectly concise for the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only two parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal. It covers the core action but lacks details like prerequisites, effect on existing encryption, or return values. Still adequate for a simple configuration update.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with descriptions for both clusterUuid and kmsKeyTag. The description does not add new meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Configure secret encryption for an NKS cluster' uses a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create or delete cluster. It is clear but could be more precise (e.g., enable/update/disable).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool compared to other NKS update tools (e.g., ncloud_nks_update_lb_subnet, ncloud_nks_set_oidc). The agent must infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.