ncloud_datafence_create_file_import

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only supply destructiveHint=false, so the description carries most of the burden. It usefully discloses capacity constraints (up to 10 files, 2 GB each) and the existence of a preview mode, but says nothing about permissions, whether the import is synchronous or approval-gated, or how failures surface. Given the limited annotation, this leaves meaningful behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences, front-loaded with source/target and scope, with the constraint and preview tip following. Nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a create tool with no output schema and full schema coverage, the description covers source, destination, capacity, and preview mode — enough to invoke it correctly. It stops short of describing the request's lifecycle (async/approval), which would be helpful for a write operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all seven parameters and the baseline is 3. The description adds one fact not in the schema (the 2 GB per-file limit) but does not otherwise clarify parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb (Request/create), the resource (file import), and both endpoints of the transfer (Object Storage bucket → Box NAS), which cleanly disambiguates it from siblings like ncloud_datafence_list_file_imports and ncloud_datafence_get_file_import. No further reading is needed to know what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It offers one actionable usage hint — 'Use dryRun=true to preview' — but gives no when-to-use/when-not guidance relative to alternatives such as ncloud_databox_apply_file_import or ncloud_ses_run_import. Usage is implied rather than contextualized.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.