ncloud_functions_get_action_activation_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only reiterates the read-only nature implied by the 'readOnlyHint' annotation ('get detailed information'). It adds no additional behavioral context such as permissions, rate limits, or data freshness. The annotation already covers the safety profile, so the description contributes minimal extra value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that directly states the tool's purpose. It is concise and front-loaded with the key action and resource. However, it could be slightly more descriptive without losing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema and the description does not mention what 'detailed information' includes. For a 'get detail' operation, the agent is left to infer the return structure, which is insufficient for proper usage. Additional context about the response fields or expected data would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for all 4 parameters (100% coverage). The tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond what is in the schema. A baseline score of 3 is appropriate given full schema coverage and no extra parameter context in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get detailed information about a specific action activation' clearly identifies the action (get) and resource (action activation). However, it does not distinguish this from sibling tools like 'ncloud_functions_get_trigger_activation_detail' or 'ncloud_functions_get_action_activations', which have similar purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description fails to provide any guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. With many sibling tools for retrieving action details, the description lacks context on how this tool differs from others like 'ncloud_functions_get_action_activations' or 'ncloud_functions_get_activations'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.