ncloud_remove_server_image_sharing

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the 'DESTRUCTIVE' warning and the confirm parameter requirement, which aligns with annotations (destructiveHint, idempotentHint). No additional behavioral traits are disclosed beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (two sentences), front-loads the critical warning (DESTRUCTIVE), and clearly states the action and requirement for confirm=true. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple destructive operation with good schema coverage and no output schema, the description provides sufficient context: what it does, the destructive nature, and the confirm flag. It is adequate for the agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already covers all parameters with clear descriptions (100% coverage). The tool description only repeats the need for confirm=true, adding minimal value. Baseline score is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Remove' and the resource 'sharing permission for a server image'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'ncloud_add_server_image_sharing' and 'ncloud_remove_member_server_image_sharing' by specifying the resource type (server image) and the action (remove).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'DESTRUCTIVE' and 'Set confirm=true to execute', which implies a cautious usage. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'ncloud_remove_member_server_image_sharing' or provide context-specific guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.