ncloud_ses_create_cluster_g3

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate destructiveHint=false, and the description does not contradict this. However, it provides minimal behavioral context: no mention of async/sync execution, return format, or the fact that creation may depend on prior setups. The hint about dryRun is helpful but insufficient for a creation tool with many parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (two sentences), front-loaded with the purpose, and includes a useful tip about dry run. It wastes no words, though it could be slightly expanded with additional context without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high complexity (20 parameters, no output schema), the description is severely lacking. It fails to explain that parameters like softwareProductCode and managerNodeServerSpecCode must be obtained from other tools, or that the operation may be long-running. For a creation tool, this lack of context reduces usability.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what is already in the schema (except mentioning dryRun, which is already documented). Baseline 3 is appropriate since schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Create'), resource ('Search Engine Service cluster'), and specificity ('G3/KVM'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like ncloud_ses_create_cluster. This provides a clear and unique purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description suggests using 'dryRun=true to preview', offering a practical usage hint. However, it does not specify when to use this tool versus other alternatives (e.g., ncloud_ses_create_cluster), nor does it mention prerequisites like needing VPC and subnet details from other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.