ncloud_secret_enable_secret

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered structurally, but the description adds nothing beyond that: no preconditions, no mention of whether enabling affects secret versions or stage values, and no auth/permission notes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with zero filler; nothing redundant is included.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity two-parameter mutation with full schema coverage and annotations covering idempotency and destructiveness, the definition is minimally viable. It stops short of describing the observable effect of enabling (e.g., what happens to versions/stages) and provides no output expectations, but nothing required to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (secretId points to ncloud_secret_list_secrets, keyIsolation fully explains host selection and the JPN constraint), so the baseline of 3 applies. The description contributes no additional parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (enable) and resource (secret) plus the precondition that the secret is disabled. The inverse relationship to sibling ncloud_secret_disable_secret is inferable from the verb, though no sibling is named explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to enable versus alternatives such as cancelling deletion, restoring versions, or simply leaving the secret disabled. Usage has to be inferred entirely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.