ncloud_kms_create_token_generator

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint: false. The description adds 'Create (activate)' implying state change but does not elaborate on side effects (e.g., whether it overwrites existing generators, permissions needed, or impact on cryptographic operations).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the action and resource. Minor improvement possible by separating 'Create' and 'activate' if they have distinct meanings.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given low complexity (1 parameter, no output schema), the description is adequate but lacks context on what a token generator is, what token-based authentication enables, and expected result or response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a single parameter described. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's description of keyTag. It does not explain how to obtain or use the key tag.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verb 'Create (activate)' and resource 'token generator for a KMS key'. It clearly states the purpose: enables token-based authentication. It distinguishes from sibling tools like update, get, delete by focusing on creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update, get). It does not mention prerequisites (key existence, key status) or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.