ncloud_nks_get_ip_acl

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint: true, so the read-only behavior is covered. The description does not contradict this but adds no further behavioral context (e.g., what the IP ACL configuration includes, whether it returns a list or object).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no unnecessary words. It efficiently conveys the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple input (one parameter) and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It tells what the tool does but does not hint at the response format or content, which could help an agent. More context, like 'returns a list of IP ACL rules', would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter (clusterUuid) described as 'UUID of the cluster'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, scoring the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get IP ACL configuration for an NKS cluster' clearly states the specific verb (Get), resource (IP ACL configuration), and context (NKS cluster). It distinguishes from the sibling tool ncloud_nks_set_ip_acl, which performs an update operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ncloud_nks_set_ip_acl. There is no mention of prerequisites or typical usage scenarios, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.