ncloud_livestation_update_channel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare idempotentHint=true (safe to retry) and destructiveHint=false (not destructive). Description adds that it updates settings but does not disclose behavioral traits like whether updates take effect immediately, if channel must be offline, or the response format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with parenthetical list, immediately stating the verb and resource. No redundant words; efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 12 parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal but sufficient for a high-level update tool. It lacks details on partial update behavior, return value, or state requirements, but annotations and schema fill many gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with each parameter described. The description only lists high-level categories (CDN, quality, recording, DVR) and does not add meaning beyond the schema descriptions. No elaboration on constraints or relationships between parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates configuration of a Live Station channel, listing specific areas (CDN, quality, recording, DVR settings). This distinguishes it from create, delete, get, and other sibling tools like stop/resume channel.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives (e.g., create_channel, start/stop_record). The description implies it's for modifying existing channel config but lacks context like prerequisite channel state or that channelId must be valid.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.